|
April 3, 2000
IMHO:
Need Security? Get A Real Expert
James W. Meritt is a senior security systems
analyst at Wang Government Systems. He can be reached at JimMeritt@wang.com.
When a
company contracts with a computer security expert to investigate breaches
in its information systems, the company is opening all its information
resources to that individual. When the media--including television, radio,
or a magazine like this one--quote an IS security expert, those news
organizations are putting their reputations on the line.
But just how good are these security experts?
With the rash of recent network security problems, experts seem to be
crawling out of the woodwork, espousing their opinions on computer and
network insecurity. In many cases, they are spreading the FUD factor: Fear,
Uncertainty, and Doubt. And, in some instances, former hackers are being
hired by major companies as security advisers.
That any business would use these people as
consultants makes one wonder if they also hire arsonists as fire marshals
or convicted burglars as security guards. Some of these security experts
have a hard enough time staying out of jail; others recommend illegal
"remedies" for finding and solving computer security problems.
While it's true that people who have exploited
information systems vulnerabilities in the past know where those specific
vulnerabilities lie, they're not the only ones with this knowledge. Their
method of becoming well-known security experts usually involves getting
caught by a law-enforcement worker and becoming famous for at least 15
minutes, publicizing your own agenda (a la hacker Kevin Mitnick's
"social engineering"), or otherwise violating the trust needed to
perform vital security services.
And just because someone is well-known in one
area doesn't mean he or she has a clue in another area. Reformed hackers
may know the ins and outs of a particular program or system but have no
idea about the continuity of operations associated with business processes.
These people also may not be aware of the legal and ethical ramifications
of some of their security solutions. Would you give full access to your
vital systems to someone who may not understand the implications of what he
or she is doing?
Ironically, the hackers-cum-experts aren't even
the cream of the crop; the good ones will not be found out or caught, and
quite possibly won't be detected. These experts who brag about their past
accomplishments are simply demonstrating their ineptitude by their
inability to avoid detection. Would you want someone who has demonstrated
incompetence to have full access to your vital systems?
There are ways to become well-qualified and
trustworthy in the computer security field that don't involve breaking into
someone's network. A proven track record--one that can be verified--with a
reputable computer security company is one indication of devotion to the
cause. Not all government organizations are behind the curve
technologically, so a comprehensive background check can be valuable tool
for companies looking at prospective security consultants. Another mark of
a bona fide security expert is certification as an Information Systems
Security Professional (CISSP) or Auditor (CISA); this shows companies that
a person has expertise in a variety of security and business areas.
But perhaps the most important consideration for
a company or publication looking to contract with a security expert is a
dose of common sense--don't take anything said at face value. Just because
someone says something can be done doesn't mean it can--or can't. As Ronald
Reagan said, "Trust, but verify." True professionals will be able
to support everything they say, and will likely be able to provide that
proof in a written report.
Be advised, however, that even the best computer
security expert may not be willing to tell you how this verification was
obtained--security experts have secrets, too. In any case, each system
vulnerability identified should be accompanied by a list of impact
assessments and countermeasures. It's much easier to break something than
to fix it; a hacker may know how to break into a network but not have a
clue about how to clean up the mess.
Information systems security is too important to
be ignored, as it has been in the past to the sorrow of those who have done
so. And it's absolutely too important to be left in the hands of
incompetent publicity-seekers. You have to do it, so do it right.
In My Humble
Opinion is an occasional column expressing the opinions of
InformationWeek's readers. Submissions of up to 750 words can be sent to imho@cmp.com. Only writers
being considered will be contacted.
OTHER
ARTICLES OF INTEREST
Link

|